XユーザーのMiss Joさん: 「In France, about a year ago, they introduced new laws to prevent children accessing porn sites.
This involved age verification - either sharing personal data or a photo of you.
Immediately between 28% and 35% of porn sites saw a drop in adult traffic. Many adults just did not want to share their personal data.
So what was the impact on children? Before the law was brought in about 2.3 million minors accessed porn sites. Afterwards about 65% are still believed to access porn sites. They are very good at working around the law - using VPNs. In fact VPN usage surged by 1000% following the law change.
So when you look at the UK restricting social media access for children you can expect that many adults won’t even bother to try and verify themselves. They don’t want to share the data. And the children? Well, the children will find a way…they always do.」 / X http://x.com/therealmissjo/status/2066561566087225456
XユーザーのJohn Bullさん: 「When VPN figures are included pushing traffic to other countries there is no obvious reduction in porn use. There is however a marked increase in smaller sites with extremely violent porn. This being due to the larger more self regulated porn sites being more restricted.」 / X http://x.com/54JohnBull/status/2066690799459275104
日本における未成年のSNS規制議論において、「一律禁止」の方向性ではなくなりそうなものの、具体的中身に注視する必要性が有るとともに、「年齢確認」については多くのSNSで現在主流となっている生年月日の自己申告制を見直すよう総務省の有識者会議の報告書の中で求めています。その具体的な手法については未確定ではありますが、上述のような問題等が起こらぬよう注視していく必要があります。」 / X http://x.com/zkurishi/status/2066723557724590194
Xユーザーのくりした善行 (Zenko)🇯🇵無所属/Anti-Censorship/C107 31日ツ01bさん: 「「大量監視」というワードは、海外と比較して公共に対して信頼がおかれている日本では陰謀論のように聞こえてしまうかも知れません。しかし、与野党問わずSNSを利用して意図的に世論誘導することも当たり前に行われるようになってきた昨今、中長期的にみると日本も他人事ではいられないように感じます。 一度導入すれば排除は困難。見えない監視、見えない誘導が最も怖いこともあり、その可能性自体を極力排除していくことが、萎縮効果を生まないためにも重要であると考えています。」 / X http://x.com/zkurishi/status/2066752763481276832
XユーザーのAsmongold Updatesさん: 「Asmongold says OnlyFans girls can't compete with a man from Pakistan armed with AI
"OnlyFans isn't even close to as profitable as it was five years ago. Girls making $10K a month are now making $2k."
"How can a normal girl compete with the sexual fantasies of the most depraved man in Pakistan armed with every AI tool to make whatever girl he wants?"
XユーザーのLilSmurfさん: 「Ever since the Fortnite Pomni model dropped there’s suddenly a surprising amount of people who don’t care about digital footprint anymore」 / X http://x.com/LilSmurfYT/status/2065220649422106735
XユーザーのRock Solidさん: 「I find it rather funny that the same people who were complaining the other day about Eve from Stellar Blade 2 being a small petite woman are now thirsting over what is essentially a loli character」 / X http://x.com/ShitpostRock2/status/2065595002718216455
XユーザーのBun-Neechanさん: 「Your bias is showing
These double standards on X are getting ridiculous.
I've been watching the drama around @ShitpostRock2 . If it's a video game character, anime design, or even a real woman from Asia, suddenly it's "child-coded," "pedo bait," or some other purity-test nonsense meant to shame anyone who likes it.
But flip it to Western media? Excuses pour in.
Take Pomni from The Amazing Digital Circus. Defenders say stuff like:
- "She's 25 and acts like an adult." - "How is that even a loli?" - "Aren’t Lolis like really small minors. Pomni is 25 bruh"
Meanwhile, far more mature Asian designs (like the full-body tactical suit character) or real adult Asian women get hit with the same accusations.
Spare me. The selective outrage isn't about protecting kids. It's about hating Asian aesthetics and the people who appreciate them.
Xユーザーの鬼虫兵庫 Hyogo Onimushiさん: 「マ〜ジっすよ。堀川に落ちたねね子が丹羽ちんのアパートでシャワーを借りるシーン、真っ黒画像に差し替えたんすよ 内容も別にエロでもなんでもなく「これからどうしよう…」と考えを巡らせているだけなのに「性的すぎる!審査不能!」って扱いになったので、黒画面でもダメなんかい…ってなってるっす」 / X http://x.com/Onimushi/status/2067063513030549984
XユーザーのSoushiさん: 「I highly doubt higher-ups are in the loop, and it really pains me as a fan of JP games. Nowadays Steam basically doesn't allow ANYTHING to do with "school romance", even if the game has no R18 content at all. Pretty sure something like Amagami would get rejected outright today.」 / X http://x.com/Minashiro/status/2067086911441658062
XユーザーのChubby♨さん: 「All the major news outlets agree: The biggest winner in the Anthropic controversy is open source.
And I wholeheartedly agree. I said it a few days ago, and I'll say it again: it's the biggest PR win for open source ever.
Whether it's Bloomberg, Fortune, or CNBC: the consensus is clear:
"Making the model open means that companies, governments or organizations with sufficient hardware can run it locally, and never have to worry about it being yanked on a whim." (Bloomberg)
The reason is as simple as it is straightforward: Companies and entire alliances of states that have had their access cut off overnight will look for a sovereign solution that makes them relatively insensitive to shutdowns. By far the most significant and powerful open-source models come from China. This has, in effect, done China a great favor, probably unintentionally.
Open source is essentially a lifeline, the opportunity to continue participating in this revolution with the assurance of independence. That's why the GLM 5.2 release was so important and came at precisely the right time. Open source is the solution.」 / X http://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2067345637201543311
Xユーザーのうみゆき@AI研究さん: 「解決する見込みのないFable遮断事件に呆れてニュースメディアは一斉に手のひら返してオープンモデルを推し始めた。米国政府が「米国を守る!」とか言ってFable遮断したせいで逆にみんな「米国クローズAIはリスク!中華オープンモデル最高!」って言いだしてる。米国政府はこんなことを望んでたんですか?自分から中国を利してるよ。てかFableが無くても依然としてOpusとGPT5.5が最強なんですけど、どうせそれらもいつまた遮断とか言われるか分からんからね。結局アテになるのはオープンモデルだけか。こんな状況だとメディアだけじゃなくて投資家やAI研究者も「米国でAI作っても意味ない」とか思い始めるよ。政府関係者達にてんでバラバラに陰口みたいなツイートとか書かせてないで公式声明で今後の方針を発表して事態を収拾せよ」 / X http://x.com/umiyuki_ai/status/2067444723972006364
XユーザーのMario Nawfalさん: 「🇬🇧 Starmer's banning social media to protect kids, but he blocked an inquiry into grooming gangs that raped children
Thanks to MP Rupert Lowe, leader of Restore Britain, the survivors finally got a national inquiry, but the public had to crowdfund it themselves!!
The Rape Gang Inquiry was privately funded by more than 20,000 donors and run by survivor-turned-activist Sammy Woodhouse, after what the report calls a catastrophic, decades-long refusal by the state to act.
Labour initially blocked a public inquiry and relented only under pressure, then drew the terms so narrowly that the cultural and religious questions were left out.
Starmer doesn't care about kids, he's scared of them finding out the truth
XユーザーのPaweł Usiądekさん: 「Bruksela chce ZAKAZAĆ VPN❗
„Zakazać VPN”, to znaczy nie rozumieć niczego o tym, czym jest VPN. To mechanizm, na którym działa np. bankowość, a nie usługa.
VPN to zaszyfrowany tunel między twoim urządzeniem a serwerem, który wybierasz. Twój ruch wychodzi z adresem tego serwera, kropka. To kryptografia i routing, nic więcej. A ten zaszyfrowany tunel to dokładnie ta sama techniczna cegiełka, co HTTPS twojego banku, SSH dowolnego developera, wewnętrzna sieć dowolnej firmy. Szyfrowanie i tunelowanie to nie „sztuczka hakerów”, to podstawa nowoczesnego internetu.
Więc „zakazać VPN” w sensie dosłownym oznacza zakazać zaszyfrowanych tuneli. A zakazać zaszyfrowanych tuneli to rozwalić e-commerce, bankowość online, pracę zdalną, słowem wszystko, co sprawia, że internet działa. Nie możesz zabić jednego bez zabicia drugiego.
Unia Europejska wprowadza obowiązkową weryfikację wieku w internecie, a w tle pojawia się pomysł ograniczenia VPN — bo to właśnie VPN pozwala obejść takie blokady.
Nie ma „jednego VPN” do zablokowania. Wynajmujesz serwer za 5 euro miesięcznie u Hetznera, DigitalOcean czy AWS, instalujesz WireGuard lub OpenVPN w trzech komendach i masz swój własny VPN na IP, którego nikt nie ma na liście blokad.
Sprytny nastolatek opinie „blokadę VPN” w kilka minut. Eurobiurokraci jednak się nie poddają. Dlaczego?
Biurokraci, którzy nigdy w życiu nie napisali jednej linii kodu, decydują o zakazie zapisu kryptograficznego, którego nawet nie potrafią zdefiniować.
Prawdziwym skutkiem nie będzie ochrona dzieci. Będzie nim infrastruktura kontroli nałożona na wszystkich — i drugi, ukryty cel: koniec anonimowości w sieci.」 / X http://x.com/PUsiadek/status/2067171642485215335
XユーザーのPaganさん: 「YouTube calling itself a “vital resource” while the UK plans to ban under-16s from TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, X, YouTube + more is peak irony 😂
This is the same group of platforms that heavily censors people who think freely for themselves.
Meanwhile Bluesky — which has had proven grooming and CSAM issues — seems to get special treatment?
The UK isn’t really trying to “protect kids.” They want to control what the next generation sees and thinks.
X is still the only major platform that’s somewhat better at free speech (though not perfect).